How birds took to flight?

Biologists have fought long and sometimes bitterly about how birds evolved -- but a new study published on Thursday suggests that their intellectual battle may have been all in vain.

Rival schools squabble as to how the first avians took to flight some 150 million years ago, when Archaeopteryx, the first identified bird, took wing.

In one corner are those who believe that birds, believed to be descendants of two-legged Theropod dinosaurs, first scuttled along the ground and learnt that by flapping their proto-feathered wings, they could shelter in trees.

In the other are those who believe that birds first learnt how to glide, leaping from trees or cliffs, and thereafter extended this trick to powered flight by flapping their wings.

What fuels the flappers-vs.-gliders debate is the belief, commonly shared by the public too, that birds have a wide and complex range of different wing strokes to do all the things they do.

But American researchers, reporting in the weekly British science journal Nature, say they have discovered that birds have a much narrower and rather simpler range of wing stroke, and this calls for a rethink of the whole issue.

University of Montana Scientist Kenneth Dial and colleagues used four synchronised high-speed digital video cameras to record a North American bird, the chukar partridge (alectoris chukar).

The birds were recorded every two days, starting the day after they hatched and continuing through to adulthood.

The investigators were surprised to find that the angles that the birds' wings made, relative to the ground, all lay within a very narrow range.

The range remained constant, regardless of the activity and age of the bird -- whether the bird was a fledgling that was running and flapping its wings, whether it was a juvenile, learning how to take off at near-vertical inclines, or whether it was an a adult, able to glide and dive with ease.

The bird's body shifted position to accomplish its aerobatics but its wings were always pitched at roughly the same angle in relation to the ground.

The angle of wing stroke fell within a narrow arc of only 19 degrees.

The authors draw an analogy with the helicopter.

Choppers can ascend and dive vertically. But this agility does not depend on the angle of attack of the rotor blades, which in fact move within a very restricted arc.

Instead, it comes mainly by modifying engine power and by shifting the body around by using the tail rotor.

Dial says that the relatively fixed angle of wing stroke among chukars has been confirmed by his lab in video recordings of more than 20 other bird species.

He argues that it is a basic feature shared by all flying birds, and there are critical changes in fossilized shoulder bones, among late theropod dinosaurs and early avians, to suggest how this change came about.

"The fundamental wing stroke we describe is plesiomorphic" -- meaning, an ancestral characteristic -- "and elementary to understanding critical elements of avian locomotion and perhaps its evolution," he says.

The arc of wing stroke provides several advantages, he says.

One is that it directs aerodynamic force at about 40 degrees above the horizontal, providing airflow under the wings that boosts the bird's agility at lower energy cost.

This would be very important for early birds with poorly developed feathers.

And it also provides an air-brake for fledgling birds.

Dial says that in the flappers-vs.-gliders debate, both theories rest on the assumption that birds with proto-feathers could at first glide, at least a little way, until they eventually gained the ability to beat their wings for locomotion.

But all the evidence among today's birds and on non-avian gliders suggests this: The gliding came later. And it came only after birds were able to flap their wings the right way, a process that was probably much simpler than thought.