Islamic Education Board [Electronic resources] نسخه متنی

In the Name of Allah,

the Most
Compassionate, the Most Merciful

Calling the Qur'an amazing is not something done only by
Muslims, who have an appreciation for the book and who are pleased with it; it
has been labeled amazing by non-Muslims as well. In fact, even people who hate
Islam very much have still called it amazing.

One thing which surprises non-Muslims who are examining the book very closely
is that the Qur'an does not appear to them to be what they expected. What they
assume is that they have an old book which came fourteen centuries ago from the
Arabian desert; and they expect that the book should look something like that -
an old book from the desert. And then they find out that it does not resemble
what they expected at all. Additionally, one of the first things that some
people assume is that because it is an old book which comes from the desert, it
should talk about the desert. Well the Qur'an does talk about the desert - some
of its imagery describes the desert; but it also talks about the sea - what it's
like to be in a storm on the sea.

Some years ago, the story came to us in Toronto about a man who was in the
merchant marine and made his living on the sea. A Muslim gave him a translation
of the Qur'an to read. The merchant marine knew nothing about the history of
Islam but was interested in reading the Qur'an. When he finished reading it, he
brought it back to the Muslim and asked, "This Muhammed, was he a salior?" He
was impressed at how accurately the Qur'an describes a storm on a sea. When he
was told, "No as a matter of fact, Muhammed lived in the desert," that was
enough for him. He embraced Islam on the spot. He was so impressed with the
Qur'ans description because he had been in a storm on the sea, and he knew that
whoever had written that description had also been in a storm on the sea. The
description of "a wave, over it a wave, over it clouds" was not what someone
imagining a storm on a sea to be like would have written; rather, it was written
by someone who knew what a storm on the sea was like. This is one example of how
the Qur'an is not tied to a certain place and time. Certainly, the scientific
ideas expressed in it also do not seem to originate from the desert fourteen
centuries ago.

Many centuries before the onset of Muhammed's prophethood, there was a
well-known theory of atomism advanced by the Greek philosopher, Democritus. He
and the people who came after him assumed that matter consists of tiny,
indestructible, indivisible particles called atoms. The Arabs too, used to deal
in the same concept; in fact, the Arabic word dharrah commonly referred to the
smallest particle known to man. Now, modern science has discovered that this
smallest unit of matter (i.e., the atom, which has all of the same properties as
its element) can be split into its component parts. This is a new idea, a
development of the last century; yet, interestingly enough, this information had
already been documented in the Qur'an which states:

" He [i.e., Allah] is aware of an atom's weight in
the heavens and on the earth and even anything smaller than
that..."

Undoubtedly, fourteen centuries ago that statement would have looked unusual,
even to an Arab. For him, the dharrah was the smallest thing there was. Indeed,
this is proof, that the Qur'an is not outdated.

Another example of what one might expect to find in an "old book" that
touches upon the subject of health or medicine is outdated remedies or cures.
Various historical sources state that the Prophet gave some advice about health
and hygiene, yet most of these pieces of advice are not contained in the Qur'an.
At first glance, to the non-Muslims this appears to be a negligent omission.
They cannot understand why Allah would not "include" such helpful information in
the Qur'an. Some Muslims attempt to explain this absence with the following
argument: "Although the Prophet's advice was sound and applicable to the time in
which he lived, Allah, in His infinite wisdom, knew that there would come later
medical and scientific advances which would make the Prophet's advice appear
outdated. When later discoveries occurred, people might say that such
information contradicted that which the Prophet had given. Thus, since Allah
would never allow any opportunity for the non-Muslims to claim that the Qur'an
contradicts itself or the teachings of the Prophet, He only included in the
Qur'an information and examples which could stand the test of time."

However, when one examines the true realities of the Qur'an in terms of its
existence as a divine revelation, the entire matter is quickly brought into its
proper perspective, and the error in such argumentation becomes clear and
understandable. It must be understood that the Qur'an is a divine revelation,
and as such, all information in it is of divine origin. Allah revealed the
Qur'an from Himself. It is the words of Allah, which existed before creation,
and thus nothing can be added, subtracted or altered. In essence, the Qur'an
existed and was complete before the creation of Prophet Muhammad, so it could
not possibly contain any of the Prophet's own words or advice. An inclusion of
such information would clearly contradict the purpose for which the Qur'an
exists, compromise its authority and render it inauthentic as a divine
revelation.

Consequently, there was no "home remedies" in the Qur'an which one could
claim to be outdated; nor does it contain any man's view about what is
beneficial to health, what food is best to eat, or what will cure this or that
disease. In fact, the Qur'an only mentions one item dealing with medical
treatment, and it is not in dispute by anyone. It states that in honey there is
healing. And certainly, I do not think that there is anyone who will argue with
that!

If one assumes that the Qur'an is the product of a man's mind, then one would
expect it to reflect some of what was going on in the mind of the man who
"composed" it. In fact, certain encyclopedias and various books clam that the
Qur'an was the product of hallucinations that Muhammad underwent. If these
claims are true - if it indeed originated from some psychological problems in
Muhammad's mind - then evidence of this would be apparent in the Qur'an. Is
there such evidence? In order to determine whether or not there is, one must
first identify what things would have been going on in his mind at that time and
then search for these thoughts and reflections in the Qur'an.

It is common knowledge that Muhaammad had a very difficult life. All of his
daughters died before him except one, and he had a wife of several years who was
dear and important to him, who not only proceeded him in death at a very
critical period of his life. As a matter of fact, she must have been quite a
woman because when the first revelation came to him, he ran home to her afraid.
Certainly, even today one would have a hard time trying to find an Arab who
would tell you, "I was so afraid that I ran home to my wife." They just aren't
that way. Yet Muhammad felt comfortable enough with his wife to be able to do
that. That's how influential and strong woman she was.

Although these examples are only a few of the subjects that would have been
on Muhammad's mind, they are sufficient in intensity to prove my point. The
Qur'an does not mention any of these things ,not the death of his children, not
the death of his beloved companion and wife, not his fear of the initial
revelations, which he so beautifully shared with his wife - nothing; yet, these
topics must have hurt him, bothered him, and caused him pain and grief during
periods of his psychological reflections, then these subjects, as well as
others, would be prevalent or at least mentioned throughout.

A truly scientific approach to the Qur'an is possible because the Qur'an
offers something that is not offered by other religious scriptures, in
particular, and other religions, in general. It is what scientists demand.

Today there are many people who have ideas and theories about how the
universe works. These people are all over the place, but the scientific
community does not even bother to listen to them. This is because within the
last century the scientific community has demanded a test of falsification. They
say, "If you have theory, do not bother us with it unless you bring with that
theory a way for us to prove whether you are wrong or not."

Such a test was exactly why the scientific community listened to Einstein
towards the beginning of the century. He came with a new theory and said, "I
believe the universe works like this; and here are three ways to prove whether I
am wrong!". So the scientific community subjected his theory to the tests, and
within six years it passed all three. Of course, this does not prove that he was
great, but it proves that he deserved to be listened to because he said, "This
is my idea; and if you want to try to prove me wrong, do this or try that." This
is exactly what the Qur'an has - falsification tests. Some are old (in that they
have already been proven true), and some still exist today. Basically it states,
"If this book is not what it claims to be, then all you have to do is this or
this or this to prove that it is false." Of course, in 1400 years no one has
been able to do "This or this or this, " and thus it is still considered true
and authentic. I suggest to you that the next time you get into dispute with
someone about Islam and he claims that he has the truth and that you are in
darkness, you leave all other arguments at first and make this suggestion. Ask
him, "Is there any falsification test in your religion? Is there anything in
your religion that would prove you are wrong if I could prove to you that it
exists - anything?" Well, I can promise right now that people will not have
anything - no test, no proof, nothing! This is because they do not carry around
the idea that they should not only present what they believe but should also
offer others a chance to prove they're wrong. However, Islam does that. A
perfect example of how Islam provides man with a chance to verify it
authenticity and "prove it wrong" occurs in the 4th chapter. And quiet honestly,
I was surprised when I first discovered this challenge. It states:

"Do they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from
any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much
discrepancy."

This is a clear challenge to the non-Muslim. Basically, it invites him to
find a mistake. As a matter of fact, the seriousness and difficulty of the
challenge aside, the actual presentation of such a challenge in the first place
is not even in human nature and is inconsistent with man's personality. One
doesn't take an exam in school after finishing the exam, write a note to the
instructor at the end saying, "This exam is perfect. There are no mistakes in
it. Find one if you can!". One just doesn't do that. The teacher would not sleep
until he found a mistake! And yet this is the way the Qur'an approaches people.
Another interesting attitude that exists in the Qur'an repeatedly deals with its
advice to the reader. The Qur'an informs that reader about different facts and
then gives the advice: "If you want to know more about this or that, or if you
doubt what is said, then you should ask those who have knowledge." This too is a
surprising attitude. It is not usual to have a book that comes from someone
without training in geography, botany, biology, etc., who discusses these
subjects and then advises the reader to ask men of knowledge if he doubts
anything.

Yet in every age there have been Muslims who have followed the advice of the
Qur'an and made surprising discoveries. If one looks to the works of Muslim
scientists if many centuries ago, one will find them full of quotations from the
Qur'an. These works state that they did research in such a place, looking for
something. And they affirm that the reason they looked in such and such a place
was that the Qur'an pointed them in that direction. For example, the Qur'an
mentions man's origin and then tells the reader, "Research it!" It gives the
reader a hint where to look and then states that one should find out more about
it. This is the kind of thing that Muslims today largely seem to overlook - but
not always, as illustrated in the following example. A few years ago, a group of
men in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia collected all if the verses in the Qur'an which
discuss embryology - the growth of the human being in the womb. They said, "Here
is what the Qur'an says. Is it the truth?" In essence, they took the advice of
the Qur'an: "Ask the men who know." They chose, as it happened, a non-Muslim who
is a professor of embryology at the University of Toronto. His name is Keith
Moore, and he is the author of textbooks on embryology - a world expert on the
subject. They invited him to Riyadh and said, "This is what the Qur'an says
about your subject. Is it true? What can you tell us?" While he was in Riyadh,
they gave him all of the help that he needed in translation and all of the
cooperation for which he asked. And he was so surprised at what he found that he
changed his textbooks. In fact, in the second edition of one of his books,
called Before we are born... in the second edition about the history of
embryology, he included some material that was not in the first edition because
of what he found in the Qur'an. Truly this illustrates that the Qur'an was ahead
of its time and that those who believe in the Qur'an know what other people do
not know.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Dr. Keith Moore for a television
presentation, and we talked a great deal about this - it was illustrated by
slides and so on. He mentioned that some of the things that the Qur'an states
about the growth of the human being were not known until thirty years ago. In
fact, he said that one item in particular - the Qur'an's description of the
human being as a "leech-like clot" ('alaqah) at one stage - was new to him; but
when he checked on it, he found that it was true, and so he added it to his
book. He said, "I never thought of that before," and he went to the zoology
department and asked for a picture of a leech. When he found that it looked just
like the human embryo, he decided to include both pictures in one of his
textbooks. Dr. Moore also wrote a book on clinical embryology, and when he
presented this information in Toronto, it caused quite a stir throughout Canada.
It was on the front pages of some of the newspapers across Canada, and some of
the headlines were quite funny. For instance, one headline read: "SURPRISING
THING FOUN IN ANCIENT BOOK!"! It seems obvious from this example that people do
not clearly understand what it is all about. As a matter of fact, one newspaper
reporter asked Professor Moore, "Don't you think That maybe the Arabs might have
known about these things - the description of the embryo, its appearance and how
it changes and grows? Maybe there were not scientists, but maybe they did
something crude dissections on their own - carved up people and examined these
things."

The professor immediately pointed out to him that he [i.e., the reporter] had
missed a very important point - all of the slides of the embryo that had been
shown and had been projected in the film had come from pictures taken through a
microscope. He said, "It does not matter if someone had tried to discover
embryology fourteen centuries ago, they could not have seen it!". All of the
descriptions in the Qur'an of the appearance of the embryo are of the item when
it is still too small to see with the eye; therefore, one needs a microscope to
see it. Since such a device had only been around for little more than two
hundred years, Dr. Moore taunted, "Maybe fourteen centuries ago someone secretly
had a microscope and did this research, making no mistakes anywhere. Then he
somehow taught Muhammad and convinced him to put this information in his book.
Then he destroyed his equipment and kept it a secret forever. Do you believe
that? You really should not unless you bring some proof because it is such a
ridiculous theory." In fact, when he was asked "How do you explain this
information in the Qur'an?" Dr. Moore's reply was, "It could only have been
divinely revealed."!

Although the aforementioned example of man researching information contained
in the Qur'an deals with a non-Muslim, it is still valid because he is one of
those who is knowledgeable in the subject being researched. Had some layman
claimed that what the Qur'an says about embryology is true, then one would not
necessarily have to accept his word. However, because of the high position,
respect, and esteem man gives scholars, one naturally assumes that if they
research a subject and arrive at a conclusion based on that research, then the
conclusion is valid. One of Professor Moore's colleagues, Marshall Johnson,
deals extensively with geology at the University of Toronto.

He became very interested in the fact that the Qur'an's statements about
embryology are accurate, and so he asked Muslims to collect everything contained
in the Qur'an which deals with his speciality. Again people were very surprised
at the findings. Since there are a vast number subjects discussed in the Qur'an,
it would certainly require a large amount of time to exhaust each subject. It
suffices for the purpose of this discussion to state that the Qur'an makes very
clear and concise statements about various subjects while simultaneously
advising the reader to verify the authenticity of these statements with research
by scholars in those subjects. And as illustrated by the Qur'an has clearly
emerged authentic. Undoubtedly, there is an attitude in the Qur'an which is not
found anywhere else. It is interesting how when the Qur'an provides information,
it often tells the reader, "You did not know this before." Indeed, there is no
scripture that exists which makes that claim. All of the other ancient writings
and scriptures that people have, do give a lot of information, but they always
state where the information came from.

For example, when the Bible discusses ancient history, it states that this
king lived here, this one fought in a certain battle, another one had so may
sons, etc. Yet it always stipulates that if you want more information, then you
should read the book of so and so because that is where the information came
from. In contrast to this concept, the Qur'an provides the reader with
information and states that this information is something new. Of course, there
always exists the advice to research the information provided and verify its
authenticity. It is interesting that such a concept was never challenged by
non-Muslims fourteen centuries ago. Indeed, the Makkans who hated the Muslims,
and time and time again they heard such revelations claiming to bring new
information; yet, they never spoke up and said, "This is not new. We know where
Muhammad got this information. We learned this at school."

They could never challenge its authenticity because it really was new! In
concurrence with the advice given in the Qur'an to research information (even if
it is new), when 'Umar was caliph, he chose a group of men and sent them to find
the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn. Before the Qur'anic revelation, the Arabs had never
heard of such a wall, but because the Qur'an described it, they were able to
discover it. As a matter of fact, it is now located in what is called Durbend in
the Soviet Union. It must be stressed here that the Qur'an is accurate about
many, many things, but accuracy does not necessarily mean that a book is a
divine revelation. In fact, accuracy is only one of the criteria for divine
revelations.

For instance, the telephone book is accurate, but that does not mean that it
is divinely revealed. The real problem lies in that one must establish some
proof of the source the Qur'an's information. The emphasis is on the reader. One
cannot simply deny the Qur'an's authenticity without sufficient proof. If,
indeed, one finds a mistake, then he has the right to disqualify it. This is
exactly what the Qur'an encourages. Once a man came up to me after a lecture I
delivered in South Africa. He was very angry about what I had said, and so he
claimed, "I am going to go home tonight and find a mistake in the Qur'an." Of
course, I said, "Congratulations. That is the most intelligent thing that you
have said." Certainly, this is the approach Muslims need to take with those who
doubt the Qur'an's authenticity, because the Qur'an itself offers the same
challenge. An inevitably, after accepting it's challenge and discovering that it
is true, these people will come to believe it because they could not disqualify
it. In essence, the Qur'an earns their respect because they themselves have had
to verify its authenticity. An essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough
concerning the authenticity of the Qur'an is that one's inability to explain a
phenomenon himself does not require his acceptance of the phenomenon's existence
or another person's explanation of it.

Specifically, just because one cannot explain something does not mean that
one has to accept someone else's explanation. However, the person's refusal of
other explanations reverts the burden of proof back on himself to find a
feasible answer. This general theory applies to numerous concepts in life, but
fits most wonderfully with the Qur'anic challenge, for it creates a difficulty
for one who says, "I do not believe it." At the onset of refusal one immediately
has an obligation to find an explanation himself if he feels others' answers are
inadequate. In fact, in one particular Qur'anic verse which I have always seen
mistranslated into English, Allah mentions a man who heard the truth explained
to him. It states that he was derelict in his duty because after he heard the
information, he left without checking the verity of what he had heard. In other
words, one is guilty if he hears something and does not research it and check to
see whether it is true. One is supposed to process all information and decide
what is garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile information to be kept
and benefited from at a later date. One cannot just let it rattle around in his
head. It must be put in the proper categories and approached from that point of
view. For example, if the information is still speculatory, then one must
discern whether it's closer to being true or false. But if all of the facts have
been presented, then one must decide absolutely between these two options. And
even if one is not positive about the authenticity of the information, he is
still required to process all of the information and make the admission that he
just does not know for sure. Although this last point appears to be futile, in
actuality, it is beneficial to the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later
time in that it forces the person to at least recognise, research and review the
facts. This familiarity with the information will give the person "the edge"
when future discoveries are made and additional information is presented. The
important thing is that one deals with the facts and does not simply discard
them out of empathy and disinterest.

The real certainty about the truthfulness of the Qur'an is evident in the
confidence which is prevalent throughout it; and this confidence comes from a
different approach - "Exhausting the Alternatives." In essence, the Qur'an
states, "This book is a divine revelation; if you do not believe that, then what
is it?" In other words, the reader is challenged to come up with some other
explanation. Here is a book made of paper and ink. Where did it come from? It
says it is a divine revelation; if it is not, then what is its source? The
interesting fact is that no one has with an explanation that works. In fact, all
alternatives have bee exhausted. As has been well established by non-Muslims,
these alternatives basically are reduces to two mutually exclusive schools of
thought, insisting on one or the other. On one hand, there exists a large group
of people who have researched the Qur'an for hundreds of years and who claim,
"One thing we know for sure - that man, Muhammad, thought he was a prophet. He
was crazy!" They are convinced that Muhammad (SAW) was fooled somehow. Then on
the other hand, there is another group which alleges, "Because of this evidence,
one thing we know for sure is that that man, Muhammad, was a liar!" Ironically,
these two groups never seem to get together without contradicting. In fact, many
references on Islam usually claim both theories. They start out by saying that
Muhammad (SAW) was crazy and then end by saying that he was a liar. They never
seem to realise that he could not have been both!

For example, if one is deluded and really thinks that he is a prophet, then
he does not sit up late at night planning, "How will I fool the people tomorrow
so that they think I am a prophet?" He truly believes that he is a prophet, and
he trusts that the answer will be given to him by revelation. As a matter of
fact, a great deal of the Qur'an came in answer to questions. Someone would ask
Muhammad (SAW) a question, and the revelation would come with the answer to it.
Certainly, if one is crazy and believes that an angel put words in his ear, then
when someone asks him a question, he thinks that the angel will give him the
answer. Because he is crazy, he really thinks that. He does not tell someone to
wait a short while and then run to his friends and ask them, "Does anyone know
the answer?" This type of behaviour is characteristic of one who does not
believe that he is a prophet. What the non-Muslims refuse to accept is that you
cannot have it both ways. One can be deluded, or he can be a liar. He can be
either one or neither, but he certainly cannot be both! The emphasis is on the
fact that they are unquestionably mutually exclusive personal traits.

The following scenario is a good example of the kind of circle that
non-Muslims go around in constantly. If you ask one of them, "What is the origin
of the Qur'an?" He tells you that it originated from the mind of a man who was
crazy. Then you ask him, "If it came from his head, then where did he get the
information contained in it? Certainly the Qur'an mentions many things with
which the Arabs were not familiar." So in order to explain the fact which you
bring him, he changes his position and says, "Well, maybe he was not crazy.
Maybe some foreigner brought him the information. So he lied and told people
that he was a prophet." At this point then you have to ask him, "If Muhammad was
a liar, then where did he get his confidence? Why did he behave as though he
really thought he was a prophet?" Finally backed into a corner, like a cat he
quickly lashes out with the first response that comes to his mind. Forgetting
that he has already exhausted that possibility, he claims, "Well, maybe he
wasn't a liar. He was probably crazy and really thought that he was a prophet."
And thus he begins the futile circle again.

As has already been mentioned, there is much information contained in the
Qur'an whose source cannot be attributed to anyone other than Allah. For
example, who told Muhammad about the wall of Dhul-Qarnayn - a place hundreds of
miles to the north? Who told him about embryology? When people assemble facts
such as these, if they are not willing to attribute their existence to a divine
source, they automatically resort to the assumption someone brought Muhammad the
information and that he used it to fool the people. However, this theory can
easily be disproved with one simple question: "If Muhammad was a liar, where did
he get his confidence? Why did he tell some people out right to their face what
others could never say?" Such confidence depends completely upon being convinced
that one has a true divine revelation. For example, the Prophet (SAW) had an
uncle by the name of Abu Lahab. This man hated Islam to such an extent that he
used to follow the Prophet around in order to discredit him. If Abu Lahab saw
the Prophet (SAW) speaking to a stranger, he would wait until they parted and
then would go to the stranger and ask him, "What did he tell you? Did he say,
'Black.'? Well, it's white. Did he say, 'Morning.'? Well, it's night." He
faithfully said the exact opposite of whatever he heard Muhammad (SAW) and the
Muslims say. However, about ten years before Abu Lahab died, a little chapter in
the Qur'an was revealed to him. It distinctly stated that he would go to the
Fire (i.e., Hell). In other words, it affirmed that he would never become a
Muslim and would therefore be condemned forever. For ten years all Abu Lahab had
to do was say, "I heard that it has been revealed to Muhammad that I will never
change - that I will never become a Muslim and will enter the Hellfire. Well I
want to become a Muslim now. How do you like that? What do you think of your
divine revelation now?" But he never did that. And yet, that is exactly the kind
of behaviour one would have expected from him since he always sought to
contradict Islam. In essence, Muhammad (SAW) said, "You hate me and you want to
finish me? Here, say these words, and I am finished. Come on, say them!" But Abu
Lahab never said them. Ten years! And in all that time he never accepted Islam
or even became sympathetic to the Islamic cause. How could Muhammad possibly
have known for sure that Abu Lahab would fulfil the Qur'anic revelation if he
(i.e., Muhammad) was not truly the messenger of Allah? How could he possibly
have been so confident as to give someone 10 years to discredit his claim of
prophethood? The only answer is that he was Allah's messenger; for in order to
put forth suck a risky challenge, one has to be entirely convinced that he has a
divine revelation.

Another example of the confidence which Muhammad (SAW) had in his own
prophethood and consequently in the divine protection of himself and his message
is when he left Makkah and hid in a cave with Abu Bakr during their emigration
to Madeenah. The two clearly saw people coming to kill them, and Abu Bakr was
afraid. Certainly, if Muhammad (SAW) was a liar, a forger and one who was trying
to fool the people into believing that he was a prophet, one would have expected
him to say in such a circumstance to his friend, "Hey, Abu Bakr, see if you can
find a back way out of this cave." Or "Squat down in that corner over there and
keep quiet." Yet, in fact, what he said to Abu Bakr clearly illustrated his
confidence. He told him, "Relax! Allah is with us, and Allah will save us!"

Now, if one knows that he is fooling the people, where does one get this kind
of attitude? In fact, such a frame of mind is not characteristic of a liar or a
forger at all. So, as has been previously mentioned, the non-Muslims go around
and around in a circle, searching for a way out - some way to explain the
findings in the Qur'an without attributing them to their proper source. On one
hand, they tell you on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, "The man was a liar," and
on the other hand, on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday they tell you, "He was
crazy." What they refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet
they refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they need both
excuses to explain the information in the Qur'an.

About seven years ago, I had a minister over to my home. In the particular
room which we were sitting there was a Qur'an on the table, face down, and so
the minister was not aware of which book it was.

In the midst of a discussion, I pointed to the Qur'an and said, "I have
confidence in that book." Looking at the Qur'an but not knowing which book it
was , he replied, "Well, I tell you, if that book is not the Bible, it was
written by a man!" In response to his statement, I said, "Let me tell you
something about what is in that book." And in just three to four minutes I
related to him a few things contained in the Qur'an. After just those three or
four minutes, he completely changed his position and declared, "You are right. A
man did not write that book. The Devil wrote it!" Indeed, possessing such an
attitude is very unfortunate - for many reasons. For one thing, it is a very
quick and cheap excuse. It is an instant exit out of an uncomfortable situation.
As a matter of fact, there is a famous story in the Bible that mentions how one
day some of the Jews were witnesses when Jesus raised a man from the dead. The
man had been dead for four days, and when Jesus arrived, he simply said, "Get
up!" and the man arose and walked away. At such a sight, some of the Jews who
were watching said disbelievingly, "This is the Devil. The Devil helped him!"
Now this story is rehearsed often in churches all over the world, and people cry
big tears over it, saying, "Oh, if I had been there, I would not have been as
stupid as the Jews!" Yet ironically, these people do exactly what the Jews did
when in just three minutes you show them only a small part of the Qur'an and all
they can say is, "Oh, the Devil did it. The devil wrote that book!". Because
they are truly backed into a corner and have no other viable answer, they resort
to the quickest and cheapest excuse available. Another Example of people's use
of this weak stance can be found in the Makkans' explanation of the source of
Muhammad's message. They used to say, "The devils bring Muhammad that Qur'an!"
But just as with every other suggestion made, the Qur'an gives the answer. One
verse in particular states:

"And they say, 'Surely he is possessed [by jinn],
'but it [i.e., the Qur'an] is not except a reminder to the
worlds."

Thus it gives an argument in reply to such a theory. In fact, there are many
arguments in the Qur'an in reply to the suggestion that devils brought Muhammad
(SAW) his message. For example, in the 26th chapter Allah clearly affirms:

"No evil ones have brought it [i.e., this
revelation] down. It would neither be fitting for them, nor would they be able.
Indeed they have been removed far from hearing."color=#009900>

And in another place in the Qur'an, Allah instructs us:

"So when you recite the Qur'an seek refuge in Allah
from Shaytaan, the rejected."

Now is this how Satan writes a book? He tells one, "Before you read my book,
ask God to save you from me."? This is very, very tricky. Indeed, a man could
write something like this, but would Satan do this? Many people clearly
illustrate that they cannot come to one conclusion on this subject. On one hand,
they claim that Satan would not do such a thing and that even if he could, God
would not allow him to; yet, on the other hand, they also believe that Satan is
only that much less than God. In essence they allege that the Devil can probably
do whatever God can do. And as a result, when they look at the Qur'an, even as
surprised as they are as to how amazing it is, they still insist, "The Devil did
this!" Thanks be to Allah, Muslims do not have that attitude. Although Satan may
have some abilities, they are a long way separated from the abilities of Allah.
And no Muslim is a Muslim unless he believes that. It is common knowledge even
among non-Muslims that the Devil can easily make mistakes, and it would be
expected that he would contradict himself if and when he wrote a book. For
indeed, the Qur'an states:

"Do they not consider the Qur'an? Had it been from
any other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much
discrepancy."

In conjunction with the excuses that non-Muslims advance in futile attempts
to justify unexplainable verses in the Qur'an, there is another attack often
rendered which seem to be a combination of the theories that Muhammad (SAW) was
crazy and a liar Basically, these people propose that Muhammad was insane, and
as a result of hi delusion, he lied to and misled people. There is a name for
this in psychology. It I referred to as mythomania. It means simply that one
tells lies and then believes them. This is what the non-Muslims say Muhammad
(SAW) suffered from. But the onl problem with this proposal is that one
suffering from mythomania absolutely canno deal with facts, and yet the whole
Qur'an is based entirely upon facts. Everythin contained in it can be researched
and established as true. Since facts are such a problem for a mythomaniac, when
a psychologist tries to treat one suffering from that condition, he continually
confronts him with facts. For example, if one is mentally ill and claims, "I am
the king of England," a psychologist does not say to him "No you aren't. You are
crazy!" He just does not do that. Rather, he confronts him with facts and says,
"O.K., you say you are the king of England. So tell me where the queen is today.
And where is your prime minister? And where are your guards?" Now, when the man
has trouble trying to deal with these questions, he tries to make excuses,
saying Uh... the queen... she has gone to her mother's. Uh... the prime
minister... well he died." And eventually he is cured because he cannot deal
with the facts. If the psychologist continues confronting him with enough facts,
finally he faces the reality and says, "I guess I am not the king of England."
The Qur'an approaches everyone who reads it in very much the same way a
psychologist treats his mythomania patient. There is a verse in the Qur'an which
states:

"Oh mankind, there has come to you an admonition
[i.e., the Qur'an] from your Lor and a healing for what is in the hearts - and
guidance and mercy for the believers."color=#009900>

At first glance, this statement appears vague, but the meaning of this verse
is clea when one views it in light of the aforementioned example. Basically, one
is healed o his delusions by reading the Qur'an. In essence, it is therapy. It
literally cure deluded people by confronting them with facts. A prevalent
attitude throughout the Qur'an is one which says, "Oh mankind, you say such and
such about this; but what about such and such? How can you say this when you
know that?" And so forth. It forces one to consider what is relevant and what
matters while simultaneously healing one of the delusions that the facts
presented to mankind by Allah can easily be explained away with flimsy theories
and excuses. It is this very sort of thing - confronting people with facts -
that had captured the attention of many non-Muslims. In fact, there exists a
very interesting reference concerning this subject in the New Catholic
Encyclopedia.

In an article under the subject of the Qur'an, the Catholic Church states,
"Over the centuries, many theories have been offered as to the origin of the
Qur'an... Today no sensible man accepts any of these theories."!! Now here is
the age-old Catholic Church, which has been around for so many centuries,
denying these futile attempts t explain away the Qur'an. Indeed, the Qur'an is a
problem for the Catholic Church. I states that it is revelation, so they study
it. Certainly, they would love to find proof that it is not, but they cannot.
They cannot find a viable explanation. But at least the are honest in their
research and do not accept the first unsubstantiated interpretatio which comes
along. The Church states that in fourteen centuries it has not yet bee presented
a sensible explanation. At least it admits that the Qur'an is not an easy
subject to dismiss. Certainly, other people are much less honest. They quickly
say, "Oh, the Qur'an came from here. The Qur'an came from there." And they do
not even examine the credibility of what they are stating most of the time. Of
course, such a statement by the Catholic Church leaves the everyday Christian in
some difficulty. It just may be that he has his own ideas as to the origin of
the Qur'an, but as a single member of the Church, he cannot really act upon his
own theory. Such an action would be contrary to the obedience, allegiance and
loyalty which the Church demands. By virtue of his membership, he must accept
what the Catholic Church declares without question and establish its teachings
as part of his everyday routine. So, in essence, if the Catholic Church as a
whole is saying, "Do not listen to these unconfirmed reports about the Qur'an,"
then what can be said about the Islamic point of view? Even non-Muslims are
admitting that there is something to the Qur'an - something that has to be
acknowledged - then why are people so stubborn and defensive and hostile when
Muslims advance the very same theory? This is certainly something for those with
mind a to contemplate - something to ponder for those of understanding!

Recently, the leading intellectual in the Catholic Church - a man by the name
of Hans - studied the Qur'an and gave his opinion of what he had read. This man
has been around for some time, and he is highly respected in the Catholic
Church, and after careful scrutiny, he reported his findings, concluding, "God
has spoken to man through the man, Muhammad." Again this is a conclusion arrived
at by a non-Muslim source - the very leading intellectual of the Catholic Church
himself! I do not think that the Pope agrees with him, but nonetheless, the
opinion of such a noted, repute public figure must carry some weight in defense
of the Muslim position. He must be applauded for facing the reality that the
Qur'an is not something which can be easily pushed aside and that, in fact God
is the source of these words. As is evident from the aforementioned information,
all of the possibilities have been exhausted, so the chance of finding another
possibility of dismissing the Qur'an is non-existent. For if the book is not a
revelation, then it is a deception; and if it is a deception, one must ask,
"What is its origin" And where does it deceive us?" Indeed, the true answers to
these questions shed light on the Qur'an's authenticity and silence the bitter
unsubstantiated claims of the unbelievers. Certainly, if people are going to
insist that the Qur'an is a deception, then they must bring forth evidence to
support such a claim. The burden of proof is on them, not us! One is never
supposed to advance a theory without sufficient corroborating facts; so I say to
them, "Show me one deception! Show me where the Qur'an deceives me! Show me,
otherwise, don't say that it is a deception!" An interesting characteristic of
the Qur'an is how it deals with surprising

phenomena which relate not only to the past but to modern times as well. In
essence, the Qur'an is not and old problem. It is still a problem even today - a
problem to the non-Muslims that is. For everyday, every week, every year brings
more and more evidence that the Qur'an is a force to be contended with - that
its authenticity is no longer to be challenged! For example, one verse in the
Qur'an reads;

"Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and
the earth were joined together, then We clove them asunder, and made from water
every living thing? Will they not then believe?"

Ironically, this very information is exactly what they awarded the 1973 Noble
Prize for - to a couple of unbelievers. The Qur'an reveals the origin of the
universe - how it began from one piece - and mankind continues to verify this
revelation, even up to now. Additionally, the fact that all life originated from
water would not have been an easy thing to convince people of fourteen centuries
ago. Indeed, if 1400 years ago you had stood in the desert and told someone,
"All of this, you see (pointing to yourself), is made up of mostly water," no
one would have believed you. Proof of that was not available until the invention
of the microscope. They had to wait to find out that cytoplasm, the basic
substance of the cell, is made-up of 80% water. Nonetheless, the evidence did
come, and once again the Qur'an stood the test of time.

In reference to the falsification tests mentioned earlier, it is interesting
to note that they, too, relate to both the past and the present. Some of them
were used as illustrations of Allah's omnipotence and knowledge, while others
continue to stand as challenges to the present day. An example of the former is
the statement made in the Qur'an about Abu Lahab. It clearly illustrates that
Allah, the Knower of the Unseen, knew that Abu Lahab would never change his ways
and accept Islam. Thus Allah dictated that he would be condemned to the Hellfire
forever. Such a chapter was both an illustration of Allah's divine wisdom and a
warning to those who were like Abu Lahab.

An interesting example of the latter type of falsification tests contained in
the Qur'an is the verse which mentions the relationship between the Muslims and
the Jews. The verse is careful not to narrow its scope to the relationship
between individual members of each religion, but rather, it summarizes the
relationship between the two groups of people as a whole. In essence, the Qur'an
states that the Christians will always treat the Muslims better than the Jews
will treat the Muslims. Indeed, the full

impact of such a statement can only be felt after careful consideration of
the real meaning of such a verse. It is true that many Christians and many Jews
have become Muslims, but as a whole, the Jewish community is to be viewed as an
avid enemy of Islam.

Additionally, very few people realize what such an open declaration in the
Qur'an invites. In essence, it is an easy chance for the Jews to prove that the
Qur'an is false - that it is not a divine revelation. All they have to do is
organize themselves, treat the Muslims nicely for a few years and then say, "Now
what does your holy book say about who are your best friends in the world - the
Jews or the Christians? Look what we Jews have done for you!" That is all they
have to do to disprove the Qur'an's authenticity, yet they have not done it in
1400 years. But, as always, the offer still stands open!

All of the examples so far given concerning the I various angles from which
one can approach the | Qur'an have undoubtedly been subjective in nature; if
however there does exist another angle, among others, which is objective and
whose basis is mathematical. It is surprising how authentic the Qur'an becomes
when one assembles what might be referred to as a list of good guesses.
Mathematically, it can be explained using guessing and prediction examples. For
instance, if a person has two choices (i.e., one is right, and one is wrong),
and he closes his eyes and makes a choice, then half of the time (i.e., one time
out of two) he will be right. Basically, he has a one in two chance, for he
could pick the wrong choice, or he could pick the right choice. Now if the same
person has two situations like that (i.e., he could be right or wrong about
situation number one, and he could be right or wrong about situation number
two), and he closes his eyes and guesses, then he will only be right one fourth
of the time (i.e., one time out of four). He now has a one in four chance
because now there are three ways for him to be wrong and only one way for him to
be right. In simple terms, he could make the wrong choice in situation number
one and then make the wrong choice in situation number two; OR he could make the
wrong choice in situation number one and then make the right choice in situation
number two; OR he could make the right choice in situation number one and then
make the wrong choice in situation number two; OR he could make the right choice
in situation number one and then make the right choice in situation number two.
Of course, the(only instance in which he could be totally right is the last
scenario where he could guess correctly in both situations. The odds of his
guessing completely correctly have become greater because the number of
situations for him to guess in have increased; and the mathematical equation
representing such a scenario is 1/2 x 1/2 (i.e., one time out of two for the
first situation multiplied by one time out of two for the second situation).

Continuing on with the example, if the same person now has three situations
in which to make blind guesses, then he will only be right one eighth of the
time (i.e., one time out of eight or 1/2 X 1/2 X 1/2). Again, the odds of
choosing the correct choice in all three situations have decreased his chances
of being completely correct to only one time in eight. It must be understood
that as the number of situations increase, the chances of being right decrease,
for the two phenomena are inversely proportional.

Now applying this example to the situations in the Qur'an, if one draws up a
list of all of the subjects about which the Qur'an has made correct statements,
it becomes very clear that it is highly unlikely that they were all just correct
blind guesses. Indeed, the subjects discussed in the Qur'an are numerous, and
thus the odds of someone just making lucky guesses about all of them become
practically nil. If there are a million ways for the Qur'an to be wrong, yet
each time it is right, then it is unlikely that someone was guessing. The
following three examples of subjects about which the Qur'an has made correct
statements collectively illustrate how the Qur'an continues to beat the odds.

In the 16th chapter the Qur'an mentions that the female bee leaves its home
to gather food.l2 Now, a person might guess on that, saying, "The bee that you
see flying around - it could be male, or it could be female. I think I will
guess female." Certainly, he has a one in two chance of being right. So it
happens that the Qur'an is right. But it also happens that that was not what
most people believed at the time when the Qur'an was revealed. Can you tell the
difference between a male and a female bee? Well, it takes a specialist to do
that, but it has been discovered that the male bee never leaves his home to
gather food. However, in Shakespeare's play, Henry the Fourth, some of the
characters discuss bees and mention that the bees are soldiers and have a king.
That is what people thought in Shakespeare's time - that the bees that one sees
flying around are male bees and that they go home and answer to a king. However,
that is not true at all. The fact is that they are females, and they answer to a
queen. Yet it took modern scientific investigations in the last 300 years to
discover that this is the case.

So, back to the list of good guesses, concerning the topic of bees, the
Qur'an had a 50/50 chance of being right, and the odds were one in two.

In addition to the subject of bees, the Qur'an also discusses the sun and the
manner in which it travels through space. Again, a person can guess on that
subject. When the sun moves through space, there are two options: it can travel
just as a stone would travel if one threw it, or it can move of its own accord.
The Qur'an states the latter - that it moves as a result of its own motion.'3 To
do such, the Qur'an uses a form of the word sabaha to describe the sun's
movement through space. In order to properly provide the reader with a
comprehensive understanding of the implications of this Arabic verb, the
following example is given. If a man is in water and the verb sabaha is applied
in reference to his movement, it can be understood that he is swimming, moving
of his own accord and not as a result of a direct force applied to him. Thus
when this verb is used in reference to the sun's movement through space, it in
no way implies that the sun is flying uncontrollably through space as a result
of being hurled or the like. It simply means that the sun is turning and
rotating as it travels. Now, this is what the Qur'an affirms, but was it an easy
thing to discover? Can any common man tell that the sun is turning? Only in
modern times was the equipment made available to project the image of the sun
onto a tabletop so that one could look at it without being blinded. And through
this process it was discovered that not only are there three spots on the sun
but that these spots move once every 25 days. This movement is referred to as
the rotation of the sun around its axis and conclusively proves that, as the
Qur'an stated 1400 years ago, the sun does, indeed turn as it travels through
space.

And returning once again to the subject of good guess, the odds of guessing
correctly about both subjects - the sex of bees and the movement of the sun -
are one in four!

Seeing as back fourteen centuries ago people probably did not understand much
about time zones, the Quran's statements about this subject are considerably
surprising. The concept that one family is having breakfast as the sun comes up
while another family is enjoying the brisk night air is truly something to be
marvelled at, even in modern time. Indeed, fourteen centuries ago, a man could
not travel more than thirty miles in one day, and thus it took him literally
months to travel from India to Morocco, for example. And probably , when he was
having supper in Morocco, he thought to himself, "Back home in India they are
having supper right now." This is because he did not realise that, in the
process of travelling, he moved across a time zone. Yet, because it is the words
of Allah, the All-Knowing, the Qur'an recognises and acknowledges such a
phenomenon. In an interesting verse it states that when history comes to an end
and the Day of Judgement arrives, it will all occurring an instant; and this
very instant will catch some people in the daytime and some people at night.
This clearly illustrates Allah's divine wisdom and His previous knowledge of the
existence of time zones, even though such a discovery was non-existent back
fourteen centuries ago. Certainly, this phenomenon is not something which is
obvious to one's eyes or a result of one's experience, and this fact, in itself,
suffices as proof of the Qur'ans authenticity.

Returning one final time to the subject of good guesses for the purpose of
the present example, the odds that someone guessed correctly about all three of
the aforementioned subjects - the sex of bees, the movement of the sun and the
existence of time zones - are one in eight!

Certainly, one could continue on and on with this example, drawing up longer
and longer list of good guesses; and of course, the odds would become higher and
higher with each increase of subjects about which one could guess. But what no
one can deny is the following; the odds that Mohammed an illiterate, guessed
correctly about thousands and thousands of subjects, never once making a
mistake, are so high that any theory of his authorship of the Qur'an must be
completely dismissed - even by the most hostile enemies of Islam!

Indeed, the Qur'an expects this kind of challenge. Undoubtedly, if one said
to someone upon entering a foreign land, "I know your father. I have met him,"
probably the man from that land would doubt the newcomer's word, saying, "You
have just come here. How could you know my father?" As a result, he would
question him, "Tell me, is my father tall, short, dark, fair? What is he like?"
Of course, if the visitor continued answering all of the questions correctly,
the sceptic would have no choice but to say, "I guess you do know my father. I
don't know how you know him, but I guess you do!" The situation is the same with
the Qur'an. It states that it originates from the One who created everything. So
everyone has the right to say, "Convince me! If the author of this book really
originated life and everything in the heavens and on the earth, then He should
know about this, about that, and so on." And inevitably, after researching the
Qur'an, everyone will discover the same truths. Additionally, we all know
something for sure: we do not all have to be experts to verify what the Qur'an
affirms. One's iman (faith) grows as one continues to check and confirm the
truths contained in the Qur'an. And one is supposed to do so all of his life.

May God (Allah) guide everyone close to the
truth.

SUPPLEMENT

An engineer at the University of Toronto who was interested in psychology and
who had read something on it, conducted researched wrote a thesis on Efficiency
of Group Discussions. The purpose of his research was to find out how much
people accomplish when they get together to talk in groups of two, three, ten,
etc. The graph of his findings: people accomplish most when they talk in groups
of two. Of course, this discovery was entirely beyond his expectations, but it
is very old advice given in the Qur'an:

Additionally, the 89th chapter of the Qur'an mentions a certain city by the
name of 'Iram (a city of pillars), which was not known in ancient history and
which was non-existent as far as historians were concerned. However, the
December 1978 edition of National Geographic introduced interesting information
which mentioned that in 1973, the city of Elba was excavated in Syria. The city
was discovered to be 43 centuries old, but that is not the most amazing part.
Researchers found in the library of Elba a record of all of the cities with
which Elba had done business. Believe or not, there on the list was the name of
the city of 'Iram. The people of Elba had done business with the people of
'Iram!

"Say, 'I exhort you to one thing - that you stand for Allah, [assessing the
truth] by twos and singly, and then reflect.....'

In conclusion I ask you to consider with care the following:

"And they say, 'Why are not signs sent down to him
from his Lord?' Say, 'Indeed, the signs are with Allah, and I am but a clear
warner.' But is sufficient for them that We have sent down to you the Book [i.e.
Qur'an] which is rehearsed to them? Verily, in that is mercy and a reminder to
people who believe."

by Gary
Miller