• Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Blue
  • Red
  • Orange
  • Violet
  • Golden
  • Counter :
  • 414
  • Date :
  • 4/17/2004

Julius Caesar Scaliger

julius caesar scaliger

   ( 4/23/1484- 10/21/1558)

   Julius Caesar Scaliger (1484-1558),humanist scholar.

  So distinguished by his learning and talents that, according to

A de Thou, no one of the ancients could be placed above him and the age in which he lived could not show his equal, was, according to his own account, a scion of the house of La Scala, for a hundred and fifty years princes of Verona, and was born in 1484 at the castle of La Rocca on theLago de Garda.

   When he was twelve, his kinsman the emperor

Maximilian placed him among his pages. He remained for seventeen years in the service of the emperor, distinguishing himself as a soldier and as a captain. But he was unmindful neither of letters, in which he had the most eminent scholars of the day as his instructors, nor of art, which he studied with considerable success underAlbrecht Dürer.


1512 at thebattle of Ravenna, where his father and elder brother were killed, he displayed prodigies of valour, and received the highest honours of chivalry from his imperial cousin, who conferred upon him with his own hands the spurs, the collar and the eagle of gold. But this was the only reward he obtained.

He left the service of Maximilian, and after a brief employment by another kinsman, the duke of Ferrara, he decided to quit the military life, and in

1514 entered as a student at theuniversity of Bologna. He determined to take holy orders, in the expectation that he would becomecardinal, and thenpope, when he would wrest from the Venetians hisprincipality of Verona, of which the republic had despoiled his ancestors. But, though he soon gave up this design, he remained at the university until1519.

  The next six years he passed at the castle of Vico Nuovo, in

Piedmont, as a guest of the family of La Rovère, at first dividing his time between military expeditions in the summer, and study, chiefly ofmedicine andnatural history, in the winter, until a severe attack of rheumatic gout brought his military career to a close.

Henceforth his life was wholly devoted to study. In

1525 he accompanied MA de la Rovère, bishop ofAgen, to that city as his physician. Such is the outline of his own account of his early life. It was not until some time after his death that the enemies of his son first alleged that he was not of the family of La Scala, but was the son ofBenedetto Bordone, an illuminator or schoolmaster of Verona; that he was educated atPadua, where he took the degree of M.D.; and that his story of his life and adventures before arriving at Agen was a tissue of fables. It certainly is supported by no other evidence than his own statements, some of which are inconsistent with well-ascertained facts (see below).


The remaining thirty-two years of his life were passed almost wholly at Agen, in the full light of contemporary history. They were without adventure, almost without incident, but it was in them that he achieved so much distincton that at his death in 1558 he had the highest scientific and literary reputation of any man in Europe. A few days after his arrival at Agen he fell in love with a charming orphan of thirteen, Andiette de Roques Lobejac. Her friends objected to her marriage with an unknown adventurer, but in1528 he had obtained so much success as a physician that the objections of her family were overcome, and at forty-five he married Andiette, who was then sixteen. The marriage proved a complete success; it was followed by twenty-nine years of almost uninterrupted happiness, and by the birth of fifteen children.

  A charge of

heresy in1538, of which he was acquitted by his friendly judges, one of whom was his friend Arnoul Le Ferron, was almost the only event of interest during these years, except the publication of his books, and the quarrels and criticisms to which they gave rise. In 1531 he printed his first oration againstErasmus, in defence ofCicero and theCiceronians. It is a piece of vigorous invective, displaying, like all his subsequent writings, an astonishing command ofLatin, and much brilliantrhetoric, but full of vulgar abuse, and completely missing the point of the Ciceronianus of Erasmus.

  The writer"s indignation at finding it treated with silent contempt by the great scholar, who thought it was the work of a personal enemy--Meander--caused him to write a second oration, more violent, more abusive, with more self-glorification, but with less real merit than the first. The orations were followed by a prodigious quantity of Latin verse, which appeared in successive volumes in 1533, 1534, 1539, 1546 and 1547; of these, a friendly critic,

Mark Pattison, is obliged to approve the judgment ofHuet, who says, "par ses poésies brutes et informes Scaliger a deshonoré le Parnasse"; yet their numerous editions show that they commended themselves not only to his contemporaries, but to succeeding scholars. A brief tract on comic metres (De comicis dimensionibus) and a workDe causis linguae Latinae--the earliest Latingrammar on scientific principles and following a scientific method--were his only other purely literary works published in his lifetime.

HisPoetice appeared in 1561 after his death. With many paradoxes, with many criticisms which are below contempt, and many indecent displays of personal animosity--especially in his reference to

Etienne Dolet, over whose death he gloated with brutal malignity--it yet contains acute criticism, and showed for the first time what such a treatise ought to be, and how it ought to be written.

  But it is as a philosopher and a man of science that JC Scaliger ought to be judged. Classical studies he regarded as an agreeable relaxation from severer pursuits. Whatever the truth or fable of the first forty years of his life, he had certainly been a close and accurate observer, and had made himself acquainted with many curious and little-known phenomena, which he had stored up in a most tenacious memory.

His scientific writings are all in the form of commentaries, and it was not until his seventieth year that (with the exception of a brief tract on theDe insomniis of

Hippocrates) he felt that any of them were sufficiently complete to be given to the world. In 1556 he printed hisDialogue on theDe plantis attributed toAristotle, and in 1557 hisExercitatioies on the work ofJerome Cardan,De subtilitate. His other scientific works, commentaries onTheophrastus"De causis plantarum and Aristotle"sHistory of Animals, he left in a more or less unfinished state, and they were not printed until after his death. They are all marked by arrogant dogmatism, violence of language, a constant tendency to self-glorification, strangely combined with extensive real knowledge, with acute reasoning, with an observation of facts and details almost unparalleled. But he is only the naturalist of his own time.

  That he anticipated in any manner the inductive philosophy cannot be contended; his botanical studies did not lead him, like his contemporary

Konrad von Gesner, to any idea of a natural system of classification, and he rejected with the utmost arrogance and violence of language the discoveries ofCopernicus. Inmetaphysics and in natural history Aristotle was a law to him, and in medicineGalen, but he was not a slave to the text or the details of either. He has thoroughly mastered their principles, and is able to see when his masters are not true to themselves. He corrects Aristotle by himself.

  He is in that stage of learning when the attempt is made to harmonize the written word with the actual facts of nature, and the result is that his works have no real scientific value. Their interest is only historical. HisExercitationes upon theDe subtilitate of Cardan (1551) is the book by which Scaliger is best known as a philosopher. Its numerous editions bear witness to its popularity, and until the final fall of Aristotle"s physics it continued a popular textbook. We are astonished at the encyclopaedic wealth of knowledge which theExercitationes display, at the vigour of the author"s style, at the accuracy of his observations, but are obliged to agree with

Gabriel Naudé that he has committed more faults than he has discovered in Cardan, and withCharles Nisard that his object seems to be to deny all that Cardan affirms and to affirm all that Cardan denies. YetLeibniz andSir William Hamilton recognize him as the best modern exponent of the physics and metaphysics of Aristotle. He died at Agen onOctober 21, 1558.


Taken from:


  • Print

    Send to a friend

    Comment (0)