- Counter :
- 1035
- Date :
- 7/9/2003

# Abu l'Hasan Ali ibn Ahmad Al-Nasawi

(about 1010 in possibly Nasa,Khurasan-about 1075 in possibly Baghdad, Iraq)

Nothing was known about al-Nasawi in Europe until 1863 when Woepcke published information on a manuscript containing a work by al-Nasawi on elementary arithmetic. Al-Nasawi had prepared an original version of it in Persian for the library of the Iranian prince Majd al-Dawlah, of the Buyid dynasty. Before the work was completed, however, Majd al-Dawlah was deposed as ruler so, on completion of the work, al-Nasawi presented it to Sharaf al-Muluk who was the vizier of Jalal ad-Dawlah (Jalal ad-Dawlah was the ruler of Baghdad from 1025 to 1044). Sharaf al-Muluk ordered al-Nasawi to rewrite the work in Arabic, and this he did. The Arabic version has survived and it is this which Woepcke studied in 1863.

From this description and from the fact that al-Nasawi dedicated another work to a Shi'ite leader in Baghdad, we at least can deduce that al-Nasawi worked for part of his life in Baghdad. A few more details of his life have become known recently. A paragraph about al-Nasawi's life has been found in a manuscript and it tells us that he spent time in Reyy, and was visited by ibn Sina. The authors of "A description of Zahiriyya "(1) give an analysis of this mid-12th century manuscript which once contained 80 tracts, but of these only 43 survive. Tract 26 is a summary ofEuclid's Elements by al-Nasawi.

The reasons which al-Nasawi gives for writing this summary are two-fold. On the one hand he says that it will act as an introduction to the Elements while on the other hand it will provide all the necessary background in geometry for anyone wanting to readPtolemy's Almagest. He does not meet the first of these aims very successfully for the tract is nothing more than a copy of the first six books of the Elements together with Book XI. All al-Nasawi appears to have done, is to omit some constructions and change a few of the proofs. This work is interesting historically for our understanding of the way that the Elements was transmitted in Arabic countries but has little significance for its contributions to mathematics.

There were three different types of arithmetic used in Arab countries around this period: (i) a system derived from counting on the fingers with the numerals written entirely in words; this finger-reckoning arithmetic was the system used by the business community, (ii) thesexagesimal(2) system with numerals denoted by letters of the Arabic alphabet, and (iii) the arithmetic of the Indian numerals and fractions with the decimal place-value system. The arithmetic book by al-Nasawi is of this third "Indian numeral" type. The book is composed of four separate treatises, each dealing with a particular class of numbers. The first deals with integers, the second with proper common fractions, the third with improper fractions, and finally the fourth with sexagesimals. In each of the four cases al-Nasawi explains the four elementary arithmetical operations. He also explains doubling, halving, taking square roots, and taking cube roots. Each method for each of the four types is illustrated with worked examples and a checking procedure is explained which usually involves usually casting out nines. The method al-Nasawi gives for taking cube roots is the same as the method described in the Chinese Mathematics in Nine Books, but quite how he learnt of this method is unknown.

Al-Nasawi is critical of works on arithmetic written by earlier authors. However, looking at the texts which he criticizes, that we can examine because they have survived, we can see now that his criticisms are not valid. In fact, in some respects, al-Nasawi does not rate too highly as a mathematician. There seems nothing original in any of his works and, more significantly, there are several places where al-Nasawi presents pieces of mathematics which he fails to properly understand. For example he fails to understand the principle of "borrowing" when doing subtraction.

Two other works by al-Nasawi have survived. One discusses the theorem ofMenelaus while the other is:

... a corrected version ofArchimedes' Lemmata as translated into Arabic byThabit ibn Qurra, which was last revised byNasir al-Din al-Tusi.(3)

## Article by:

J J O'Connor andE F Robertson## Notes:

1-J ragep and E S Kennedy, A description of Zahiriyya (Damascus) MS 4871:a philosophical and scientific collection. Hist. Arabic Sci,5 (1-2) (1981),85-108

2-In thesexagesimal system calculations are done in the base 60 as used by the Ancient Babylonians.

The remnants of sexagesimal notation remain in our method of telling time and measuring angles.

3- Biography inDictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 1970-1990)

Taken from: http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/history/Mathematicians/Al-Nasawi.html